Timeline for Is this the kind of language we should be promoting on SF
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2014 at 12:53 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | :( It's a good answer, @HopelessN00b, with or without the language. That was never in question. | |
| Feb 5, 2014 at 9:59 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | ...and now it's been sanitized, and is less memorable. Oh well. | |
| Feb 4, 2014 at 22:40 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | I did flag it. It was memorable. :) | |
| Feb 4, 2014 at 22:30 | comment | added | user9517 | It looks like @voretaq7 has located the offending post and has cleaned it up. Unsurprisingly ... | |
| Feb 4, 2014 at 21:44 | comment | added | user9517 | The review audits are automagically generated and are a waste of good reviewer's time. If you can find it again and flag it that would be a goof thing to do. | |
| Feb 4, 2014 at 21:41 | history | answered | Katherine Villyard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |