Timeline for Should we punish and also close questions with blindingly obvious answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| May 7, 2014 at 15:11 | comment | added | MadHatter | And yet another still when you point that out, and they claim that their question is still valid. | |
| May 7, 2014 at 14:46 | comment | added | Andrew B | There are plenty of questions where the author is clearly out of their depth and needs to either receive a minimum amount of training or hire a professional. We cannot help these people. It's one thing to answer a simple, "obvious" question...it's another when it's clear the person you are working with doesn't have any grasp of fundamentals whatsoever and really needs to buy a book. | |
| May 7, 2014 at 5:33 | comment | added | user9517 | s/not to sink/not to sink further/. The history of SF is littered with talented people who could make a great contribution but have walked away because of the poor quality of questions. We are all worse off for this. | |
| May 7, 2014 at 5:08 | history | answered | MadHatter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |