Timeline for Remove "Professional" close-reason
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Nov 25, 2014 at 15:55 | comment | added | HBruijn | I'll admit it may appear a lazy choice but with 40+ active sites in the category technology alone and 186 proposals in Area51 my knowledge of what is on-topic and where decreases by the day. | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 15:30 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Sorry, but I disagree. If the question is good it shouldn't be close, it should be migrated to where the good question can get good answers. If it's crap to begin with it should be close because it's crap, not because the crap is also off-topic. This rewording has the exact same problem as the original wording. | |
| Nov 24, 2014 at 13:57 | comment | added | Andrew B | This answer addresses the problem while avoiding the land mine of bullet #3. It also steers people towards the other SE sites, which the current answer does not. Me likey. | |
| Nov 24, 2014 at 12:14 | history | edited | HBruijn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 53 characters in body
|
| Nov 24, 2014 at 10:11 | history | answered | HBruijn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |