Timeline for Recent changes of site moderation behavior
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
28 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2015 at 16:09 | vote | accept | peterh | ||
| Jan 31, 2015 at 16:08 | answer | added | peterh | timeline score: -7 | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:52 | answer | added | SvenMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:43 | answer | added | HopelessN00bMod | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:20 | vote | accept | peterh | ||
| Jan 31, 2015 at 16:09 | |||||
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:11 | answer | added | Jenny D | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:05 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD Ok. Yes, I did it, because their name I've seen most times behind the changes. Stats I don't have, first because I didn't collect, second because I don't see it would be needed, at least not now. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:01 | comment | added | Jenny D | @PeterHorvath I think English is your second language, which may make communication harder. With evidence I meant statistics showing e.g. a change in the number of migrations and closures. That is not the same as accusing someone. (However, you did specifically name two moderators...) | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 19:00 | comment | added | peterh | @JennyD Yes, there is no evidence, because now in this post I didn't accuse anybody. I only asked, why are these. I think it was enough clear. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:59 | comment | added | Jenny D | I am downvoting due to a lack of foundation for your statements. You say that you have seen this, but you show no evidence. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:48 | comment | added | peterh | @HopelessN00b Actually, I expected an answer like: "(1) is because... (2) is not so, (3) is okay, because...". And then I had got away with peace. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:46 | comment | added | peterh | @HopelessN00b And what I don't understand: I didn't even said that all of these changes were bad! I even supported (1), and wish to remain! | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:45 | comment | added | peterh | @HopelessN00b It were very clear reason for 1 downs, but not for 5. Actually what I really miss here, is the clear answer, the downvotes I simply don't understand. Really only I experienced the named changes here? | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:44 | comment | added | HopelessN00b Mod | Both, actually. I may get around to answering, I may not, but there nothing "not nice" about a downvote. It's just a quick way to register an opinion on the content you're voting on. Nothing more, nothing less. But it sure comes in handy when you're too busy to write out you opinion in an answer or comment. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:42 | history | edited | peterh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:41 | comment | added | peterh | Hm. There is no answer, but soon 3 downvotes, and critics against the "sentiment of my question". Heyy! This time I tried to be really nice! What had been happened if I don't? :-) | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:39 | comment | added | peterh | @HopelessN00b About your "personal diosagreement": you think it is not so as I write, or you think, I see these changes well, but they are on your opinion okay? | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:38 | comment | added | peterh | @HopelessN00b Personal disagreement can be maybe explained more clearly in an answer as with downvotes. I also write: "I don't have evidence if there is also causal link." | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:36 | comment | added | HopelessN00b Mod | Maybe disagreement with the sentiment and statements? I know that I personally disagree with all your positions on 1, 2 and 3. I also don't think that the new mods are responsible for additional migration activity, because I almost never close-vote for migration, and have put even stopped a few migrations with a mod-close vote (to prevent a question with 3 or 4 migration votes from getting migrated). | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:35 | history | edited | peterh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:33 | comment | added | peterh | @Sven Well, now I am only curious why you do this. Actually, the downvotes are answers, too, but I think, you could be nicer... | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:26 | comment | added | peterh | @Sven Maybe disagreement with the statements in my question? | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:25 | comment | added | Sven Mod | Maybe disagreement with the idea and sentiment of your question? | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:24 | comment | added | peterh | @Sven I know, but disagreement with what? Disagreement with a question? | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:22 | history | edited | peterh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:22 | comment | added | Sven Mod | Downvotes on Meta mean disagreement. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:21 | comment | added | peterh | This time I only asked a question, I hadn't any negativ intent. Imho, the moderation of the SF is currently the best between the for me known SF sites, and this was also a reason to be as nice, as possible. I really can't understand the downvote. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 18:17 | history | asked | peterh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |