Timeline for Google Cloud Platform support on Server Fault
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Feb 13, 2015 at 18:20 | vote | accept | Shog9 | ||
| Feb 13, 2015 at 17:56 | comment | added | Shog9 | None of these are migrated, @Iain - just retagged. And they could use a bit of review from folks who have a better idea of what they're doing here. I'll let Community bump a pile of questions in a bit to restore some variety to the homepage, but if you could take a few minutes to look over what's there now I think it could be beneficial. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 17:53 | comment | added | user9517 | @HopelessN00b I guess that you also check if the tags good or not too rather than blindly retagging. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 17:51 | comment | added | Matthew Ife | Dumping 50 questions, some of which are questionably tagged, over to SF has now made me ignore that tag. Well done. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 17:49 | comment | added | HopelessN00b Mod | @Iain Alternatively, the "tag-bitch" mod here is pretty good at covertly retagging and retagging off-hours so the efforts most fly under the radar. Shog could ask him to do it. I hear he takes payment in beer, Scotch and/or Irish whiskey. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 17:36 | comment | added | user9517 | Dude can you quit spamming the front page with migrations ! We generally request that people who are going to push loads of stuff onto the front page rate limit themselves so as to not push new questions out of site. I think we'd be grateful if you did the same. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 17:32 | history | edited | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 236 characters in body
|
| Feb 13, 2015 at 0:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/566024704847523840 | ||
| Feb 12, 2015 at 13:39 | comment | added | Reaces | I for one welcome our new Google Overlords. Regardless, creating a tag and seeing how it evolves can do no real harm (other than giving HopelessN00b more work if it ends up needing cleanup). If the questions are coming I'm sure the usage will follow. Even if it gets used for a different purpose than originally defined, that just means we should adjust the definition. | |
| Feb 11, 2015 at 23:10 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | It sounds like it's on-topic to me. | |
| Feb 11, 2015 at 22:24 | answer | added | HopelessN00bMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Feb 11, 2015 at 21:28 | history | edited | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 253 characters in body
|
| Feb 11, 2015 at 21:19 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | We have a tag for AWS, so this proposed tag does have precedent. | |
| Feb 11, 2015 at 21:07 | history | asked | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |