Timeline for Should the rep requirement for creating tags on Server Fault be raised?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2015 at 4:13 | comment | added | Jim B | 20 percent is not a bad ratio for a taxonomy without rules. I suspect that further limiting the creation of tags will likely mean untagged or mistagged items. It's probably easy to fix an item tagged "fixed", "width" as fixed-width, not so much when it's tagged "unix" | |
| Feb 18, 2015 at 1:04 | vote | accept | HopelessN00b | ||
| Feb 16, 2015 at 6:06 | vote | accept | HopelessN00bMod | ||
| Feb 16, 2015 at 6:11 | |||||
| Feb 14, 2015 at 14:50 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | I like 1000, too. | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 12:36 | comment | added | Frederik | Another +1 for 1000-1500 here. I think that users with that rep must know what a tag is and how it should be used. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 13:51 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | +1 for 1000 to 1500. There's a tradeoff here between eliminating worthless tags and granting access to a useful organization tool. I'm of the opinion we'd significantly reduce lousy tags at 1000 rep without putting new tags out of reach of the majority of contributors. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 10:57 | comment | added | Reaces | Taking myself as an example, I think 1000 is a high enough threshold. I'd find it odd/unfortunate if I was unable to create tags... | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 7:19 | history | answered | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |