Timeline for Many old questions getting additional proftpd/vsftpd tags
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2016 at 8:30 | vote | accept | MadHatter | ||
| Feb 1, 2016 at 8:30 | |||||
| Jan 25, 2016 at 23:49 | comment | added | TRiG | See also: meta.superuser.com/a/10816/31641. Don't go looking for problems you cannot fix. (I've been guilty of this myself in the past.) | |
| Jan 25, 2016 at 23:41 | comment | added | TRiG | SO is absolutely massive, and no one person is going to materially affect the front page. SF is significantly smaller, and it may be best to edit in small short bursts to avoid flooding. | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 21:09 | comment | added | user9517 | @mdpc The purpose of the push to the front page is community oversight. Imagine the spam that would get edited n if noone saw the changes. | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 20:56 | comment | added | yagmoth555 Mod | +1 To make the cleaning, and by the author I respect that. For the question of bringing old stuff's up, well, it's more a SO/SF's issue, as the cleaning is never bad to do.If people does not like that, well, they can select 'newest', not 'active', as I already do (as the 'community' robot keep pooping old unanswered question anyway) | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 18:33 | comment | added | mdpc | Maybe edits on items older than some SE site specified time frame should NOT be moved to the front page. I'd suggest that questions older than 3 months should not be pushed to the front page after an edit. | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 15:58 | history | answered | Castaglia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |