Timeline for We should bring back the "question must show a minimal understanding" close reason
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Feb 18, 2016 at 23:58 | history | edited | Shog9 |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 18, 2016 at 7:31 | vote | accept | Massimo | ||
| Feb 17, 2016 at 0:52 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 4:08 | answer | added | Jim B | timeline score: -4 | |
| Feb 12, 2016 at 3:39 | comment | added | Massimo | @MichaelHampton Nice info to have, thanks. | |
| Feb 12, 2016 at 3:30 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Here are close reason statistics for the last 90 days. | |
| Feb 12, 2016 at 3:18 | comment | added | Massimo | @MichaelHampton see my answer for a possible solution. | |
| Feb 12, 2016 at 3:18 | answer | added | Massimo | timeline score: 13 | |
| Feb 12, 2016 at 3:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/ServerFault/status/697982948725936128 | ||
| Feb 12, 2016 at 2:32 | answer | added | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 12, 2016 at 0:58 | comment | added | Wesley | I'm at the point where I don't care what the default close vote reasons are. As long as there's a custom input where I can supply my own reason, I use it. Given how many people thereafter select my custom reason as a close reason, I think we as individuals can do better than what SF allows us to officially have. Don't worry about it, just make up your own. | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 22:51 | comment | added | Massimo | Or we could go biblical: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do". | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 22:41 | answer | added | HopelessN00b | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 21:01 | comment | added | yagmoth555 Mod | I would name the closure "My cat know more on that matter than a lot of people, especially you." | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 20:29 | history | edited | Massimo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 171 characters in body
|
| Feb 11, 2016 at 15:02 | answer | added | user9517 | timeline score: 26 | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 14:50 | comment | added | Massimo | The "managing information technology systems in a business environment" and "reasonable business information technology management practices" could be merged; the former mainly suggests taking unrelated questions to StackOverflow or SuperUser, but that is already covered by "belongs on another site", which also allows specifying which one. | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 14:46 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | OK, which one do you want to delete? We are already at the maximum number of custom close reasons. | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 14:41 | history | asked | Massimo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
