Timeline for Don't vote to close so many old questions at once
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2016 at 22:42 | answer | added | Falcon Momot | timeline score: -1 | |
| Mar 1, 2016 at 1:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/ServerFault/status/704472336720904192 | ||
| Feb 22, 2016 at 11:22 | comment | added | Daniel | Oh, I see! Still, I think no one should be blamed for trying to improve Serverfault. Not even you 😜 | |
| Feb 22, 2016 at 10:51 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @Daniel It's me. Ward's not saying that some noob is doing it, Ward is referring to me with the last half of my nick. | |
| Feb 22, 2016 at 9:39 | comment | added | Daniel | If all the close votes you've seen are legitimate, why do you call him a noob? Don't discourage active participation. The problem is not the guy who creates dozens of close votes. The problem is that there are not enough people to look through the votes. But that is not something that person is responsible of. Maybe the problem is also that he is technically able to create so many close votes. But that is not his fault, either. | |
| Feb 22, 2016 at 7:59 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | Close queue is at 195 right now, FWIW. So yes, as has been the case for quite a while, there are not enough active members of the community to process the close review queue. | |
| Feb 22, 2016 at 7:53 | answer | added | HopelessN00b | timeline score: 10 | |
| Feb 22, 2016 at 4:57 | history | asked | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |