Timeline for What to do with the "rm -rf" hoax question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2016 at 15:03 | comment | added | Kaz | @JennyD I always remember this by way of German: "Ich habe, du hast, er hat -> I have, thou hast, he hath". | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 8:25 | comment | added | Jenny D | @MadHatter Well, I started out as a language major, I didn't get into IT until I was in my mid-20's. | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 8:20 | comment | added | MadHatter | @JennyD congratulations on a grasp of period English that probably exceeds that of 95% of those native to the sceptred isle. I knew we Brits were comparitively poorly grounded in other people's languages, but this is just embarrassing. | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 8:04 | comment | added | Jenny D | @MadHatter I am. I read a lot, including Shakespeare.... | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 7:59 | comment | added | MadHatter | @JennyD I thought you were Swedish! How camest thou by such command of Shakespearean English? | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 14:41 | comment | added | Jenny D | @TheCleaner "Thou hast" or "thou dost have". Never "thou doth hast". ("doth" is for third person singular - I do, thou dost, he/she doth.) | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 13:45 | comment | added | TheCleaner | Oh @Iain - such wisdom thou hast. Has? doth hast? +1 | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 13:41 | comment | added | user9517 | It was closed as a dupe. Delete the hoax and keep the dupe. Consider merging the answers from the hoax into it. Remember SF is for practical problems you are trying to solve. A hoax by definition isn't this. | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 13:33 | history | answered | SvenMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |