Timeline for your post was converted to a comment
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2016 at 15:31 | comment | added | user9517 | @Rob-d Many OPs don't really know. Without seeing the OPs configs written in blood I'd take what they say with a pinch of salt. | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 21:26 | comment | added | Sum1sAdmin | @alexus - I'm glad you learned something, unfortunately it had nothing to do with Apache syntax, as the same error was in the OP's 2.2 config, try figuring that one out. | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 14:44 | comment | added | alexus | @KatherineVillyard at the end of the day, I'm the real winner here) and that's because I learned new things) Thanks to everyone all around! | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 14:38 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | @alexus I see you got your bounty! Congratulations! I'm really glad you reposted an expanded version of your answer. | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 4:02 | comment | added | alexus | @Iain I actually still think that my answer was correct answer, but again I'd expect OP to test any changes in testing environment before promoting any changes into live environment. Since Sven is MIA, I went ahead and answer question again, but slightly different) Thanks to KatherineVillyard for UV! | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 17:58 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | I'm actually the person who upvoted the since-deleted answer. I appreciate that he was backing up Sven. That doesn't make me less exasperated with the comment thread that followed. (As for whether the comment/answer is an answer or not, I think the OP should repost it as one, expanding it as suggested here to make sure we all realize it's an answer, and have done with it.) | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 5:55 | comment | added | user9517 | @josh that's mostly correct yes NAA is a blunt instrument. I wrote this Q&A based on some mSE posts 1,2 to explain it. SE has some odd definitions for example an unanswered question may have one or more answers non of which have an upvote. Alexus' answer was an answer. It may have been wrong or an answer to a different question but it's still an answer and should be acted upon appropriately. | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 1:14 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @Rob-d That's the SE stance, yeah. "Not Paris!" "Purple?" and "Washington D.C." all count as answers to the question of what Norway's capital is. Before he deleted it, someone posted an answer with SE's stance on what constitutes an answer. Like it says, think of them as apples. A rotted-out apple serving as bug food is still an apple. | |
| Apr 28, 2016 at 22:08 | comment | added | Sum1sAdmin | @Iain "Your comment is not asking for more information or suggesting improvements - it's not a comment." - then, any random turn or phrase is an answer? (Q. what's the capital of Norway? A. It's not Paris!) - I flagged the "Answer" as a comment - there was a specific question that had nothing whatsoever to do with Apache syntax - and then a comment about Apache syntax with no explanation as to why it was being pointed out. the comment has since been edited to make it look a little less like a total Red Herring. | |
| Apr 28, 2016 at 21:33 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @KatherineVillyard Careful, now... sounds like you're disagreeing with someone there. Even worse, it could be taken as agreeing with someone else. Someone could take such a thing personally, you know. | |
| Apr 28, 2016 at 18:04 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | Some of the comments on the deleted answer (like Shog's above) make me want to turn this Internet right around. | |
| Apr 28, 2016 at 13:14 | history | edited | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 279 characters in body
|
| Apr 28, 2016 at 6:29 | history | answered | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |