Timeline for New review option: approve trivial edit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2016 at 11:21 | comment | added | Rob Moir | @tim we understand but you have a bigger chance of going to the pet store and buying a cat with three buttholes than you do of getting Stack Exchange to approve a suggestion that would be helpful on sites that aren't stack overflow itself, where the churn of new posts is so high that they don't see the problem you describe and we've all seen. | |
| May 28, 2016 at 21:16 | comment | added | Tim | That doesn't really answer my question. If someone corrects the word "teh" to "the" in a post from 2010 that is unremarkable, do you allow the edit because it actually does help the post, or do you reject it because it bumps a post for a trivial reason? My suggestion is to allow the edit but not bump the post. | |
| May 28, 2016 at 3:10 | history | answered | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |