Timeline for Problems reviewing such wide ranging topics
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 23, 2017 at 11:02 | comment | added | yagmoth555 Mod | @ToddWilcox I doubth too that another stack can be useful, as the lack of questions about MS product is not because SF dont serve them well, its because MS direct new user to the technet forum first. (Kinda why Iam happy on SF, lot less entry level questions here usually) | |
Nov 21, 2017 at 23:34 | comment | added | womble Mod | UL and AskUbuntu exist for "user" questions. SF is a professionally-focused site. And yes, the "skip" button is your friend (I hammer it regularly). | |
Nov 21, 2017 at 20:12 | comment | added | Todd Wilcox | Good points. That said, I note the existing of both a Unix/Linux stack and a dedicated Ubuntu stack. Another point against a separate Microsoft stack is that there really doesn't seem to be as much Microsoft traffic on SF, by a wide margin. If a Microsoft stack magically appeared overnight, it might never make it out of beta for lack of sufficient interest separate from SF, unlike the Unix/Linux and Ubuntu stacks. | |
Nov 21, 2017 at 20:07 | comment | added | Sven Mod | I don't believe SE would want to go there. SO is massive and could be split into at least half a dozen sub sites, but they still keep this behemoth going. With SF, personally I wouldn't want this to happen because I've learned a lot just by browsing questions about things I don't know much about and I would most likely not go over to MS related site on a regular basis. | |
Nov 21, 2017 at 20:03 | vote | accept | Todd Wilcox | ||
Nov 21, 2017 at 20:03 | comment | added | Todd Wilcox | I wonder if this is really a review problem or an opportunity to further spin off site(s) from SF. Yes, there is overlap between LAMP and Microsoft, but I'm starting to think a separate Microsoft servers and services focused stack may be justified. Assuming it hasn't already been proposed and declined in Area 51 (which it probably has). Anyway, thanks for clarifying! | |
Nov 21, 2017 at 19:58 | history | answered | SvenMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |