5

Seems like a good candidate for merger. Only one question in each. Or should it be handled with a simple re-tag?

2
  • 3
    Also? Woot on our very own meta.
    – sysadmin1138 Mod
    Commented Jul 22, 2010 at 21:49
  • 1
    My very first question on the original Meta was for this. Nice to see it's finally come to fruition!
    – Mark Henderson
    Commented Jul 22, 2010 at 22:38

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
3

Small mergers like this should just be done with a manual retag (which I've done). It's when you start to get boatloads of them that a mod should get involved and to a mass retag. Basically, if a manual retag is going to be a big pain or if it's going to clutter up the front page with a bunch of bumped questions request a mod do it.

2
  • 1
    I also put a proposal down for a tag synonym [ssi] => [server-side-includes]
    – squillman
    Commented Jul 22, 2010 at 22:01
  • Thanks for the best-practices guide!
    – sysadmin1138 Mod
    Commented Jul 22, 2010 at 22:22
3

Shouldn't every tag merge become a tag synonym as well?

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .