By reviewing posts I have found a number of discrepancies in reviews presented by review audits, which will be visible if one pays enough attention.
So if I am sure a review is an audit rather than a real review, I could stop considering what is an appropriate response to this review, and instead start considering, what the audit want me to answer.
Should we be gaming the system by taking this approach instead?
As far as I can tell, the following rules can tell me, what an audit want me to reply:
- If the post cannot be found through links other than the review links, vote it down.
- If the post can be found through other links, vote the same as the majority has done.
What are your thoughts on reviewing a post in a way that you don't find appropriate, but which you expect the audit to be satisfied with?