I came across Must boot manually after a manual installation of Debian on ZFS root file system on the main site.
The OP had not included the specific error messages in the question (they were posted in a comment about two days later) and I felt the post could use some copy-editing. So I proposed an edit to that effect.
That edit was rejected, because:
- This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.
- This edit was intended to address the author of the post and makes no sense as an edit. It should have been written as a comment or an answer.
Frankly, I don't understand why either of these reject reasons would apply to my proposed edeit.
The edit added the specific errors the OP is seeing to the question itself, which would seem to make it more accurate and/or easier to find.
The edit (IMO) improved formatting, fixed a typo, and cleaned up some of the grammar. I don't see how that should have been written as a comment or an answer.
Can someone please shine some light on why my edit was rejected?