I've recently gained the ability to review first posts and I'm curious about what posts genuinely deserve an upvote. The handy help box suggests the following:
No Action Needed when this post needs no action from you.
But also states:
...upvote the question if you can't find any problems with it...
The first statement would seem to suggest that most posts which pass basic readability/sense checks should just be sent on their merry way, however the second statement would suggest that all non-sucky posts should be upvoted.
Which approach is best for the community?