@JennyD You're right, shame on them. The RFC clearly states that's what example.com is for.

-1, The Google crawler doesn't recognize text contained in images. If you must use images for textual content, consider using the ALT attribute to include a few words of descriptive text.

in the future, just use our placeholder john q domain to avoid any confusion.

I agree, it's the same answer at its core @iopq, just adding more information, which is what comments are for, and it's at the OPs (the one who wrote the answer) discretion if they want to edit their answer to include the information. If, for example, there is another way to answer the OPs problem, for example by using powershell to run some hidden cmdlet, then that would warrant a separate answer. For reference, answers that do nothing more than restate an existing answer (which usually is just an attempt to gain rep) are frowned upon and usually have the opposite of the intended effect.

I agree, SE should really change the wording on that comment, because it's slight inaccurate as we see.

Gotta d/v this. The message specifically says To answer it, you must have earned at least 10 reputation on this site. You haven't earned 10 rep on this site, you have earned rep on other sites in the network and 100 rep was given to you on this site because of that.

Just don't raise it beyond my rep :)

One downvote, I wonder where that came from.

...We've basically all saved a good home or dev environment question that we liked... +1, but when did @hopeless get all soft hearted?

While noble, courage does not merit an upvote.

@Iain my mistake, I was thinking about the election phase, not the true second (primary) phase. I've update my answer.

@Iain I'm on SE mobile, easier to just ask the question :)

Did they make it to the next round though?