Did this happen on the mobile site or the full site?

I agree; I like to keep in in-ecosystem as much as possible.

Did a quick check; looks like these -3 were not from the same user as the first -10

Subtly amusing, but no - not really in the spirit of the site. I'd hate to see someone take it seriously.

Also, for what it's worth, hanging out in the chat room is no guarantee of leniency. Obviously we can't name names, but we've had to give a slap on the wrist or even suspensions to many high-rep users for any number of things over the years, even to those who hang out in chat. We don't like giving anyone a slap on the wrists or a suspension, but we do it when we need to.

I typically only see rudeness to people who have been rude first; such as people who put no effort into their question (not searching first, just dumping a whole log without explanation, typical "Do my job for me" questions) or by people who take offense to people telling them that they're way off track and doing it wrong. Can you provide some examples?

Not going to get into this particular discussion; just a quick note - the only moderator attention on that question was from someone who answered it; the 5 people that closed it were not moderators

@TheCleaner - you can't; it's data presented to ourselves as mods (and only about mods)

Ohhh... yeah you could be right

It's not on?! What's all that "Shown how to ask and skipped" flag that we always see?

Now that we have the stats, how do you intend on using them? Is it based on volume of bad questions, or the percentage? 256 bad questions in 2 months isn't so bad compared to 2,181 bad questions from registered users. That's (at a very rough estimate) about 1/5th of bad questions are from unregistered users. And then what about the 43% that weren't bad questions?