Timeline for Amend an accepted answer to be more correct
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://cooking.stackexchange.com/ with https://cooking.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 18, 2011 at 22:10 | comment | added | Rob Moir | @Mark - I agree with offering improvements to an answer. I disagree with attempting to force your edits onto the original owner of an answer by going into a wikipedia-style edit/revert war with them. If something is dangerous then yes it must then be corrected but in that case it should be flagged. | |
| Aug 18, 2011 at 22:08 | comment | added | Rob Moir | I've seen that thread before. Thankfully it doesn't happen that way too often that I see but its a reminder that as good as our system is, when it goes wrong it goes real wrong. | |
| Aug 18, 2011 at 20:52 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | I tend to disagree. Improving the answer is exacty what the edit button is for, not just for spelling, but for content as well. We can deal with isolated incidents as they arise. | |
| Aug 18, 2011 at 20:12 | comment | added | artifex | I can see the slipperly slope you are refering to. | |
| Aug 18, 2011 at 19:53 | history | answered | Holocryptic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |