Timeline for Worse than usenet? Our image to prospective new users.
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2013 at 2:48 | history | edited | Falcon Momot |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 18, 2011 at 9:45 | comment | added | Keith Thompson | Just a reminder: Usenet still exists. | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 6:52 | answer | added | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 13, 2011 at 11:19 | comment | added | the-wabbit | Oh come on. The Usenet was highly democratic - and a loud mob of egocentric people craving for recognition, acting angry and pecking on newcomers and strangers is what you inherently get with a democracy - you can see it on TV every freaking day. Aside from that it was an open platform which served its purpose of facilitating discussions rather well. Stackexchange "meta" and "area51" are nothing but implementations of the same regulatory concepts you have seen in alt.admin groups. | |
| Dec 13, 2011 at 2:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/146414625750134784 | ||
| Dec 13, 2011 at 1:22 | answer | added | John Gardeniers | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 13, 2011 at 1:03 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Let me just point out that there is NOTHING worse than usenet. | |
| Dec 12, 2011 at 18:05 | answer | added | MDMarra | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 12, 2011 at 17:25 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 25 | |
| Dec 12, 2011 at 16:59 | comment | added | user9517 | I do sometimes wish we could go about the business of tidying up without the need for a pile on. | |
| Dec 12, 2011 at 16:58 | answer | added | Chris S | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 12, 2011 at 16:50 | answer | added | voretaq7 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 12, 2011 at 16:32 | answer | added | Chopper3Mod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 12, 2011 at 16:25 | history | asked | Sven | CC BY-SA 3.0 |