Timeline for Voting on the FAQ rewrite, round 2
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
30 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 20:32 | history | edited | sysadmin1138Mod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 14, 2012 at 22:43 | history | edited | ZypherMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 11, 2012 at 0:58 | history | edited | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Strike 'no exceptions'. It had a lot of votes on the edit question, and there was continuing interest. Thus, I'm short-cirtcuiting the change to not force people through an "editing the faq" question after this goes live.
|
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:33 | history | notice added | voretaq7Mod | Historical significance | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:33 | history | locked | voretaq7Mod | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:33 | history | notice removed | voretaq7Mod | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:33 | history | unlocked | voretaq7Mod | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:32 | history | notice added | voretaq7Mod | Historical significance | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:32 | history | locked | voretaq7Mod | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:32 | history | notice removed | voretaq7Mod | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:32 | history | unlocked | voretaq7Mod | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 0:53 | vote | accept | sysadmin1138Mod | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 0:02 | history | notice added | voretaq7Mod | Historical significance | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 0:02 | history | locked | voretaq7Mod | ||
| Feb 8, 2012 at 2:40 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | Changing tags to links was suggested in the editing round and wasn't accepted. If anything, I'd prefer to add to the visual appeal you get by breaking up blocks of text by putting in icons for the sister sites and figuring some way to work tags into the off-topic subject lists. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 15:07 | comment | added | MDMarra | Is it too late to make [windows-server-2008] say [windows-server-2008-r2] since that's the latest? I know it's a bit late, but it doesn't change the substance. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 12:46 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | @JohnGardeniers I want over 100 total votes, which would bring it to about 20-25% of the votes cast for moderators. I have an open question about using a System Message to point main-site users to this poll. If we get that, we might actually break 50. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 7:57 | comment | added | user11604 | I'd prefer links to tags too. It's a good compromise between keeping the tags and getting rid of them, and will allow the grammatical inconsistencies to be resolved. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 7:37 | comment | added | the-wabbit | changing tags to links sounds like a good idea. It would make for a more compact read | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 6:24 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Ok, we need/want a 2/3rds majority but is there some minimum number of votes for it to pass or are we just using the time limit? Just curious. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 5:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/166755064898269184 | ||
| Feb 7, 2012 at 4:04 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | I've got no problem with links instead of tags (I started the tag business based on DBA's FAQ[ -- Our stylesheet is substantially uglier, but prettying that up is a matter for another debate). I'm content to leave capitalization/formatting of site names to the SE team - I assume that they will at least cast their eyes over this and make sure we aren't making any tragic mistakes. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 3:20 | comment | added | nhinkle | I strongly dislike the aesthetic of having tags inline. It makes it hard to read. If those were changed to links it would still achieve the intended purpose without making it look horrible. Also, it's "Super User", not "SuperUser", and "Stack Overflow", not "StackOverflow". | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 2:21 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 2:21 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 27 | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 2:20 | history | asked | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |