Timeline for Stop sending things to SuperUser to die!!
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jul 29, 2010 at 19:34 | comment | added | tomjedrz | Why on earth was this question cited moved? It could have been closed as vague, edited, or voted down. But who on earth would thing it appropriate for SuperUser.com? | |
| Jul 29, 2010 at 7:06 | comment | added | Graviton | @Farseeker, no, I'm dead serious :) | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 21:29 | comment | added | Mark Henderson | @Ngu, you're kidding, right? | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 18:49 | answer | added | Gnoupi | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 13:09 | comment | added | Graviton | You know, the reason why we like to move questions from SF to SU is because SU is such a boring place; it's only right to give them some fun. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 5:06 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | I hate it when a question is moved because the majority of votes were for the move but even those who voted otherwise get listed as being responsible for the move. More than once I've held back from voting because there are already 3 votes to move a question that really should be killed. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 4:10 | comment | added | EEAA | Time to fess up - I believe I was one of those that voted for the SU move. In retrospect, that was an ill-conceived idea. I'll make sure to be more selective in what I send over there in the future. | |
| Jul 27, 2010 at 21:51 | comment | added | Mark Henderson | @Chris, I think you've nailed it right there. It only takes a majority vote to get it migrated. Maybe that should change, or on option should be given to somehow un-vote a move vote. | |
| Jul 27, 2010 at 17:07 | comment | added | Chris S | I think part of it is that it only take 3 people to move it to SU. I for one voted to close (not a real question); but I suspect I was not the only one to do so. I know I've done that on other questions too only to have them end up on SU. | |
| Jul 27, 2010 at 13:05 | answer | added | duffbeer703 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 23:29 | answer | added | Zoredache | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 23:09 | comment | added | Zoredache | For more examples see. serverfault.com/questions/163310/… and serverfault.com/questions/163184/what-is-bandwidth-closed. | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 22:51 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 22:01 | comment | added | Zoredache | That question doesn't remotely belong on SU. If someone would have taken time to actually understand it and rewrite it a bit, it isn't really that bad of a beginner question. | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 22:00 | answer | added | Zypher | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 21:14 | answer | added | Kara MarfiaMod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 21:14 | comment | added | Warner | I couldn't agree more. SO could use some of the same medicine. | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 21:06 | answer | added | Kyle Brandt | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 26, 2010 at 20:38 | history | asked | Mark Henderson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |