Timeline for Line noise check, RE: our topic matter
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 10:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 27, 2013 at 23:28 | comment | added | Andrew B | Yeah, you've got a point. I was mostly trying to address my eye-twitching whenever someone derails a discussion with sentiments along the lines of the topic matter is pointless, let me inject my alternate reality fanfic of what SF is about into this otherwise useful debate. In the future I'll just link to the nearest dupe, or this topic failing that. | |
| Aug 27, 2013 at 23:24 | vote | accept | Andrew B | ||
| Aug 23, 2013 at 22:59 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @syneticon-dj Close votes are our equivalent of every member of the group posting "OMFG DID YOU READ THE FAQ YOU DAMN N00B". We're slightly more civilized -- but only slightly. | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 21:50 | comment | added | the-wabbit | Having gotten the chance to know both, Serverfault's culture is quite definitely not the Usenet culture. The Usenet had no instruments for closing or voting, so in most groups the usual method of expressing doubt about a question's topicality or quality was crafting a post to ridicule the original poster as bluntly as possible. Which often resulted in endless flame wars. | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 17:37 | history | answered | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |