Timeline for 2014 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Dec 2, 2014 at 0:56 | comment | added | Adi Inbar | I just want to point out, this guy has the best overall combination of experience in activities relevant to moderation--reviewing, flagging, editing, meta.sf & MSE participation, participation at multiple SE sites. His voting record (both number and up/down ratio) shows understanding of what makes SE sites tick (poor questions should be downvoted, but more importantly upvotes encourage positive participation). And I think his answers show the right approach to helping SF succeed--get rid of truly useless noise without being too exclusive and chasing people off for not being advanced enough. | |
| Nov 28, 2014 at 20:13 | comment | added | peterh | In the sense of the hostility, SO is much worser as SF. | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 14:10 | comment | added | TheCleaner | @sysadmin1138 regarding the close review queue. Call me selfish, but once I hit 1,000 reviews in it, I really stopped caring to go in there often. There was no fake reward to be had at that point. Maybe the badges could reset at 1,000 after giving the gold reward and start over for multiples of the same review badges? | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 12:37 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | @AndrewB "this isn't exactly the best way for multiple mods to make their reintroduction" What you said. | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 6:19 | comment | added | user9517 | @AndrewB Don't worry the jewellers shop full of diamonds will be as absent as ever before the year ends. | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 5:15 | comment | added | Andrew B | @Ward A large part of why I took that the mod comments so poorly was because it left me with a feeling that we're avoided by SE until opportunities to say things like this present themselves. This is a really crappy, morale murdering impression that I hope I remain in the minority on. A 24 hour break got my head back in the game, but this isn't exactly the best way for multiple mods to make their reintroduction. | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 0:58 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | Regarding review-queues. There are some admin stats available that really show the differences between reviewers. In the last 30 days, of the people with >100 close-reviews, the close-vote percentage ranges from 59% to 95%. | |
| Nov 24, 2014 at 23:13 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | @Jaydles I'm referring to Shog's comments on HopelessN00b's nomination and Zyper's answer and Kyle's comment here: meta.serverfault.com/a/6703/6177 We're all lumped together as being "a community full of hate" | |
| Nov 24, 2014 at 22:14 | comment | added | Jaydles Staff | I'm troubled that you think SE staff have said (or even think) that all this community's members are hostile or toxic. I won't speak for my peers, but I know for a fact that SF has tons of awesome, generous participants, many of whom are also patient and kind, sometimes even to some folks who haven't earned it. I do think this community has been more challenged than others by lost drive-bys, and the result has been much more visible pockets of hostility than almost any other of our sites have, but we know there are tons of givers here, including those who've lost patience of late. | |
| Nov 24, 2014 at 20:13 | history | answered | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |