Timeline for Does irrationality have to be contagious?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
Jan 2, 2015 at 22:12 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | Marcos, I get that you're upset that you created a feature that you wanted and people downvoted you for posting about it. I don't think your post here is going to do anything but draw more downvotes to your original post, though. | |
Jan 2, 2015 at 21:08 | comment | added | MadHatter | I pine for the return of the "not professional" close reason, and accompanying requirement... | |
Dec 31, 2014 at 22:36 | comment | added | Reaces | I'm going to start off with full disclosure. I don't know anything about fail2ban or RBLs (it's not really my area). However I believe you're misinterpreting the down votes. This isn't that people are saying your idea won't work. It's that they disagree with the idea. These are 2 different concepts. The idea is that this will discourage others from implementing the same if they found the question. It's like saying "Well sure you could police your own neighborhood, but honestly it's dangerous and probably won't work out well". | |
Dec 31, 2014 at 16:25 | comment | added | Andrew B | It's rarely ever a good idea to post a rant on meta about being downvoted. Unless you're specifically looking for constructive criticism about why you were downvoted and how to avoid it in the future, all it tends to accomplish is drawing more attention (and downvotes) to the topic in question. | |
Dec 31, 2014 at 16:16 | answer | added | SvenMod | timeline score: 15 | |
Dec 31, 2014 at 14:47 | history | asked | Marcos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |