Timeline for Some parting thoughts... and apologies for the drama
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 14, 2015 at 13:33 | vote | accept | HopelessN00b | ||
Apr 13, 2015 at 14:07 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | The "typed out diarrhea" that n00b describes is something every Stack Exchange site has had to go through, especially Stack Overflow. You guys, however, seem especially good at generating drama over it. | |
Apr 13, 2015 at 14:01 | comment | added | Robert Harvey |
@BigHomie: n00b was called a liar and Shog "promised" to "get to the bottom of this" -- That is a bit odd. It suggests that I still don't know the whole story.
|
|
Apr 13, 2015 at 12:49 | comment | added | MDMoore313 | @RobertHarvey When current data shows he already knew about it. So there is no question of accountability, those in the community who were active on this meta were aware and approved of what was going on, and n00b was arguably elected on a clean up campaign. The core community here is in agreement with off topic Q/As and what should be done about them. | |
Apr 13, 2015 at 12:49 | comment | added | MDMoore313 | @RobertHarvey I've read your comments here, but I'm not sure you know the whole story. In fact, I'm convinced you don't, because no one here does, we know n00b's side, and we're currently waiting for Shog's post mortem. That being said, Shog assumed the worst, which is fine if one suspects a hacked account or a rogue mod or whatever, however after dialog w/ n00b confirming this was not the case, n00b was called a liar and Shog "promised" to "get to the bottom of this" | |
Apr 13, 2015 at 1:17 | comment | added | Robert Harvey |
The biggest problem I see here is that Stack Exchange is showing that they do not trust democratically elected moderators to do what they were elected to do -- It's not a question of trust; it's a question of accountability. Your statement seems to imply that there's no need for any, which is demonstrably false.
|
|
Apr 12, 2015 at 22:37 | comment | added | TheCleaner |
"I don't know why anyone would want to be a moderator, now" - well crap...I might as well start getting used to Evan Carroll as moderator.
|
|
Apr 11, 2015 at 18:26 | comment | added | Dan | And this is the problem with giving people the veneer of democracy - either make it a democratic process or make it a mandated one, but pretending that it's democratic when at any point someone from on-high can come in and throw their weight around makes it all very silly. There's nothing wrong with accountability, but this episode hasn't shown SE in a particularly good light in my opinion. | |
Apr 11, 2015 at 16:24 | history | edited | Ryan Ries | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 126 characters in body
|
Apr 11, 2015 at 16:09 | history | edited | Ryan Ries | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 233 characters in body
|
Apr 11, 2015 at 15:49 | history | answered | Ryan Ries | CC BY-SA 3.0 |