Timeline for Editing content on 4 year-old questions isn't always necessary
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| May 23, 2016 at 11:29 | vote | accept | ewwhite | ||
| May 23, 2016 at 11:27 | history | edited | ewwhite | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| May 21, 2016 at 19:57 | history | edited | ewwhite | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 21, 2016 at 18:48 | answer | added | HopelessN00b | timeline score: -4 | |
| May 21, 2016 at 18:10 | answer | added | Andrew B | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 21, 2016 at 18:10 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | Yeah, I'm years ahead of you on that particular reason, so I get it. Just saying it's not gonna change for the better, so adjust accordingly. | |
| May 21, 2016 at 18:03 | comment | added | ewwhite | I'm not too butt-hurt, but it goes into the pile of reasons for diminished interest and participation. | |
| May 21, 2016 at 17:59 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | Yup, but that's the license and the way things go around here. Author's original intent isn't nearly as important as they like to pretend, or say to the sub 2k peons. | |
| May 21, 2016 at 15:02 | answer | added | SvenMod | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 21, 2016 at 12:55 | history | asked | ewwhite | CC BY-SA 3.0 |