Timeline for Should subjective questions be subjected to closure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jun 20, 2014 at 16:49 | answer | added | Andrew B | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 19, 2014 at 14:32 | history | edited | MDMoore313 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Made the title catchier, added more information about generally closing subjective questions.
|
| Sep 13, 2013 at 7:25 | comment | added | Rob Moir | Part of the problem with trying to boil down a hard and fast rule or two for 'good subjective' is that it's impossible to define what a 'good subjective' question looks like. You can say whatever you like about how to deal with a 'good subjective' question and we might all agree but that's not going to help when people aren't certain that a particular question actually is a good question. It seems pointless to over-think solving the first part when the second isn't solvable. | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 21:31 | comment | added | Zoredache |
I disagree with your premise. That question does not pose a generally useful query. That question will not generate useful opinion based answers beyond saying that Benchmarks not specific to your environment are worthless 80-90% of the time.
|
|
| Sep 12, 2013 at 20:47 | comment | added | TheCleaner | blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/good-subjective-bad-subjective | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 20:21 | answer | added | Falcon Momot | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 19:50 | history | asked | Magellan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |