Timeline for Getting downvotes on personal ground
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 18, 2015 at 9:57 | answer | added | Jenny D | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 7:43 | comment | added | peterh | @Reaces I didn't "shout" and "yell". Thank you. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 7:41 | comment | added | Reaces | @peterh My argumentation is trying to explain the added attention. The more you yell and shout, the more people will take notice of you. And because of this your bad questions / answers will see more downvotes, and your good ones more upvotes. Why do you immediately assume malice? Is it so hard to think that perhaps some of your content is not that good? Nobody disputes that you give a lot of answers. So why do you feel the need to defend yourself before anyone even mentions your reputation? It's really not helping your case if you get emotional about everything all the time on meta. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 0:46 | comment | added | Andrew B | RE: meta, experience tells me that most of the people are voting based on topic and attitude, not who you are personally. That's certainly where my downvote comes from. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 0:43 | comment | added | peterh | @joeqwerty Then I would get upvotes too. But my experience is that if I post anything into the meta, I get exclusively downvotes. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 0:41 | comment | added | peterh | @Reaces Next to my "vocality" I give a lot of upvoted answers as well. My reputation is coming mainly from answers, and my reputation/visit ratio is not exceptional. Your argumentation about my behavior is only explaining the personal revenge, but is not an excuse. | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 0:22 | vote | accept | peterh | ||
| Mar 17, 2015 at 19:15 | comment | added | Reaces |
Being very vocal with your opinions, and often going directly against the common consensus you can expect a lot of profile views. Which you have, 312 views over about a years time! That's a view nearly every day. And let's be honest, that question is bad. It doesn't show much research and doesn't really scream professional either. I'm sure if you posted this question as it is today, it would get the same treatment. If you want to be more vocal than most people, act like a politician and clean up your past? I'm pretty sure most meta visitors are voting based on the content, not the poster.
|
|
| Mar 17, 2015 at 18:33 | comment | added | joeqwerty | peterh: maybe you're reading too much into it. While the possibility exists that these down votes are personal it's also possible that these are from people who are just now finding the question. I've had plenty of "drive by" down votes on questions and answers that are 1, 2, 3 or more years old. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 18:12 | answer | added | 200_success | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 16:25 | answer | added | HopelessN00bMod | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 16:24 | answer | added | SvenMod | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 16:00 | history | asked | peterh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |