The latter I would reject - the question is old, has (accepted) answers and there is no evidence that the edit is by the OP. I'm not sure if the anonymous user would get an custom reject message but I might add one advising them to ask their own question.
The former ... it's a train wreck. The edit partially answers the original question badly and then re asks the original question poorly too. I'd be tempted to reject it and ask the OP to provide an answer as to how they got lighty working and then to ask another question if they still have one.
The OP of the question really doesn't appear to understand how the site works and more importantly needs education rather than a Q&A site.
ooh looking more closely the OP asked the question 3 hours ago but the edit says
Hi, finally managed to get lighty to work with everything I want. Took
so there is something weird going on here.