-23

For example, you could continue this by closing/deleting of every hardware question, saying that a professional system administrator doesn't make his hands dirty with dusty server parts.

Then, you could continue by closing every software raid question, because a professional system administrator working environment uses a shared or network-attached storage. Using your own Linux server with software raid is not professional, could you say, of course I suggest to use some euphemism for that (for example: "we can't give the required support which it would deserve").

The next phase would be the closing and deleting of every question involving any web interface of any device. The reason would be, that they are essentially control panels, which is also forbidden already.

Of course, Windows servers and generally, Windows-based corporate networks shouldn't also let out from the destruction. Unfortunately, I don't know enough well these technologies to suggest my creative ideas, but I think similar reasonings would also work. For example, any question involving scripting and AD could be closed saying that programming questions are offtopic.

Most questions regarding the cloud could be also closed, saying that they don't involve actual system administration, with the exception if you are one of the sysadms of it (but in this case, you won't come here with your questions).

Questions involving the basic IP infrastructure could be also closed as un-professional. For a professional system administrator couldn't be a problem, for example, how the dns system works. There could be another reason, saying these questions are relating to routers and not to servers. This would make destructible every question regarding cisco devices and routing protocols.

Questions involving file versioning software could be also closed as they belong to software development and not to the professional system administration.

There could be yet a little problem. The CMs probably won't be happy. But fortunately, if there are 5 3k+ users working on a consistent, well-reasoned way, it will be very hard for them to argument, that it is not a community decision. Minor clashes are possible, for example revoked moderator permissions or some months in the cage, so the team doing the destruction should have some backup members, too.

Most of the CMs probably doesn't have a professional system administrator background, but they have probably a good general image from the sysadm work. This is exactly the knowledge level, where it will be probably a very strong argument if you say, that you are focusing now for the quality, and this requires the hard filtering. Your argumentation should target as if you wanted to reach some unbelievable, idealistic goal which will result a much better site.

Another focal point is that never, nobody should destroy a lot of questions at once. It would be much better if the destruction happened in small steps, and you should show always a consistent face to the CMs. You should also state, "we destroy only crap". It is very important, because the CMs sometimes think that 5 enough determined 3k+ users equals the community.

Of course, there will be always questions whose destruction won't be easily explainable. The strategy would be in their case, that find common points in them, and then create a reason for that point. The usage of the words "non-standard", "not professional" or "not supported" are always very helpful.

I think, in the case of the last some thousand questions there will be another serious problems. The SE surely won't allow to completely empty the site, it doesn't matter how well are you argumenting for that.

I think, these last some thousands of questions should remain. After that, it will be enough if only the new users would be consistently harassed, bullied - for example, because they don't know all of the relevant meta posts regarding the topic of the site. So, their questions should be closed as offtopic. In some month, maybe in some years, the site will be slowly get out from the google cache, the number of the new users will drop, and the site-suicide will be finally

READY.


Extension: It seems, we can finally delete everything about VirtualBox! This wonderful idea can be applied anywhere: only we should switch "uncommon" software to "unprofessional". Of course, nearly all emulation and virtualization solution could be also deleted on this reasoning, except hyperv and vmware.

  • 8
    I....don't even know where to begin. – EEAA May 6 '15 at 3:29
  • @EEAA I could have made this shorter, with a clear structure. If I did, would you be now satisfied with the post? – peterh May 6 '15 at 3:34
  • 5
    My comment was about the content, not the structure. – EEAA May 6 '15 at 3:43
  • 5
    If we reduce the community down to five users, I think we could streamline the process further. Just think about it: mandatory surgeries to add straw shaped neck catheters! We may need to keep a few stools around for the shorter help vampires, but I think we're on to something here. – Andrew B May 6 '15 at 5:52
  • 6
    I enjoyed reading that. – Mark Henderson May 6 '15 at 7:00
  • Someone has broken the rules. youtube.com/watch?v=OrHdo-v9mRA – MDMoore313 Jun 19 '15 at 16:30
11

To me you've actually highlighted the sorts of thoughtful good on topic questions that are totally OK here! I read this as uplifting because you know what? This community has some smart people with smart people problems.

But we have a pretty high bar of entry. For the reasons Michael Hampton alludes to.

I'm all for the broadening of the scope of the site, and being welcoming to the more consumer-but-still-serverish problems (unlike most of the high rep community members), but I'm not really seeing anything right now that concerns me more than it ever has in the past.

Thanks for the good read!

  • 2
    I'd want to amend that: s/have a pretty high bar of entry/should have a pretty high bar of entry/. – Jenny D May 6 '15 at 12:05
18

Your post omitted some important tasks:

  • It should not be required for users to engage in thought before they ask a question here; we are here to do their thinking for them. The same for research; if a user doesn't thoroughly research their question, the community should do it for them. It should be effortless on their part. If such a question appears, upvote it. If it gets closed, vote to reopen it.
  • If a question appears where the user obviously put a lot of thought and research and effort into it, downvote and vote to close it. We don't want to encourage these sorts of behaviors.
  • We should be spending as much time as possible explaining the basics of computing to people who are thoroughly lost. How to use a mouse, what a CPU core is, etc. These questions are to be encouraged so that these users aren't lost anymore.
  • 1
    I sense sarcasm in this answer. – kasperd Dec 12 '15 at 21:23
  • 2
    Sarcasm? Really?! – Michael Hampton Dec 12 '15 at 21:26
8

It is also important to remember that we who are trying to help these poor new users are the real majority of users on stack exchange.

It is time that those of us who have been fighting against this dreadful destruction of valid content double down and continue to fight the good fight.

And let's not forget, when asked, the founders of this site clearly indicated that every question is worth keeping. Be it here, or on one of the many other stack exchange sites!
In short: deleting questions should never happen!

Disclaimer:
I don't actually participate in either side of this discussion, as a new user I'm more content reading questions / learning from great answers. Leaving the managing of the sites to those who have been around for a few years. And I'm personally still undecided on whether or not these old questions are worth closing.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .