Timeline for Abrupt change in moderation staff?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
32 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| May 23, 2015 at 15:12 | answer | added | bwDraco | timeline score: 13 | |
| May 12, 2015 at 10:55 | comment | added | Dreaded semicolon | Interesting to read all this drama unfolds. I want this to be made into a TV drama that lasts for 10 seasons. on a serious note I hope SO stays a good place for developers to ask and get answers. I can't think of any better place for serious programming questions. | |
| Apr 15, 2015 at 22:40 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | Congrats, @ChrisS! Go, you! | |
| Apr 15, 2015 at 21:22 | comment | added | Wesley | We do miss you @ChrisS. Good to hear you're doing well. =) | |
| Apr 15, 2015 at 7:42 | comment | added | Rob Moir | congrats on the new job and thanks for your hard work @ChrisS | |
| Apr 14, 2015 at 15:34 | comment | added | MDMoore313 | @ChrisS congrats on the job! way to sneak in here ;) Hope to hear from you in chat. | |
| Apr 14, 2015 at 14:05 | comment | added | EEAA | @ChrisS Understood and appreciated. Thank you for the work you did put in here! | |
| Apr 14, 2015 at 13:57 | comment | added | Chris S | @EEAA I'm just a side note to all the action. I changed jobs in January and have much less time to participate. Compounding that, I strongly disagree with the direction the site has been taking, more so since the last election. I was pretty vocal about this toward the end of last year. Though I didn't always agree with the proposed solutions, I completely agreed with the people saying SF had a "walled garden" mindset problem. I don't have the energy fight it when the community overwhelmingly elected a mod running on that platform. I can't keep supporting a community I disagree with so much. | |
| Apr 12, 2015 at 14:46 | comment | added | user186340 | It looks like ad revenue is dropping and Stack Exchange is desperately trying to get new users even at the expense of site's quality. First we had this "summer of love" bullshit that opened the gates for a deluge of crap questions over on Stack Overflow, then we got this nonsense, disguised as a feature-request even though they imposed it which made flags even less effective against the low quality crap on SO, and now they're going after ServerFault... oh god. | |
| Apr 12, 2015 at 5:03 | answer | added | Katherine Villyard | timeline score: 38 | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 18:41 | answer | added | David V | timeline score: 22 | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 2:49 | answer | added | voretaq7Mod | timeline score: 40 | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 23:43 | answer | added | James | timeline score: 9 | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 19:14 | answer | added | HopelessN00b | timeline score: 25 | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 17:48 | answer | added | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | timeline score: 31 | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 11:49 | vote | accept | EEAA | ||
| Apr 10, 2015 at 3:28 | history | edited | masegaloeh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add links to "Who are the moderators?" page
|
| Apr 10, 2015 at 2:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/586355935859322882 | ||
| Apr 9, 2015 at 22:21 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 49 | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:53 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @Shog9 Yup, go for it. As to your answer, that will be along a little later, once I figure out what I wish to do in response to this blindsiding... And I cool off some. Also, what, specifically, you'd like explained would probably be useful to me - I don't see how closing explicitly off-topic questions requires an explanation, so your request for an explanation confuses me a little. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:38 | comment | added | EEAA | @Shog9 Please. You now have permission. Can you enlighten us as to what this is about? | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:33 | comment | added | Shog9 | If you want to do this publicly, that's your call @Hopeless. Regardless of where we hold this discussion, I still expect an answer. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:28 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @shog9 go ahead and say whatever you wish to about it and/or me. I'm honestly a bit curious myself, given that the on topic page explicitly calls out administration panels as off topic. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:24 | comment | added | Shog9 | Not that it's relevant @TheCleaner, but this is trivial to implement if y'all wanna decide on what the pop-ups should contain. Michael requested suggestions ages ago but near as I can tell no one took him up on the offer. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:21 | comment | added | TheCleaner | Oh sure...ask a question about moderators and get immediate comments from SE staff...ask for a feature-request and get crickets -- I'm taking my shovel and pail home. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:17 | comment | added | Shog9 | I'm waiting for a response from the person responsible. Hopefully, we can work this out without a ton of drama. For now, just know that removal of mod privileges is the moderator equivalent of suspension - an expedient way of halting a problematic situation until it can be resolved. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:16 | comment | added | EEAA | I, for one, greatly appreciate the work all the mods do. It's something I'd like to do, but don't have the time for. Seeing one lose mod status without explanation is quite upsetting. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:14 | comment | added | EEAA | @Shog9 Understood if someone wants to stop down. That's fine. In the other case, though, what gives? They were elected by the users, and if that person did something so egregious as to warrant forcible removal of their mod status, I would love to know what that thing was. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:10 | comment | added | Shog9 | One of them decided to step down, and asked for his moderator status to be removed. The other decided something else and didn't ask anyone anything. I'll leave it to them to go into more detail if they wish to do so. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:05 | comment | added | Wesley | Someone hold me. I'm scared. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 21:04 | history | asked | EEAA | CC BY-SA 3.0 |