Skip to main content
55 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Apr 27, 2016 at 19:24 comment added Lzh @Sven, that's enough proof for moderation purposes. But what kind of publicity is one that shows how BAD and risky it is to get services from that service provider? Maybe his confession is what is false, and he is trying to undo his mistake of showing everyone that his company isn't following best practices. Maybe he wasn't expecting publicity. Just a hypothesis.
Apr 27, 2016 at 9:18 comment added Sven Mod @Mzn: He admitted it in a mod message.
Apr 27, 2016 at 6:07 comment added Lzh What's the proof that the question was a hoax? The italian article doesn't show any "proof".
Apr 26, 2016 at 14:22 comment added WoJ @MichaelHampton: (unrelated to the conversation) you may want to add a Google Translation link (translate.google.com/…) for the article in Italian you linked in the (now locked) question.
Apr 22, 2016 at 18:28 comment added yagmoth555 Mod Question for a mod/community manager, any update if we nuke the account ? as it seem a option the community want.
Apr 20, 2016 at 4:22 comment added Andrew B @aroth Hrm, my apologies then. I did look at the permissions list and I thought you'd at least have enough to suggest an edit. (just not enough to apply it directly)
Apr 20, 2016 at 4:16 comment added aroth @AndrewB - I'm pretty sure I don't have enough rep on serverfault to click the 'edit' link? The only option it gives me is 'share'. @gldraphael - You may be right. Or at least, his claim that "the command that I mentioned in the article is harmless", where the command is rm -rf /, seems to be false. Unless Ansible really does prevent that sort of thing? I have no idea if it does, but seems a bit far-fetched to think that it would?
Apr 20, 2016 at 4:09 history edited Andrew B CC BY-SA 3.0
added a link in English per contribution in comments
Apr 20, 2016 at 4:05 comment added Andrew B @aroth At the time of the posting it was the only article, because the publication had direct contact with the author. The link you shared was posted two days after this meta topic, and no one was stopping you from clicking on the edit link. :)
Apr 19, 2016 at 10:46 comment added user56reinstatemonica8 @gldraphael I wonder if it could possibly be connected to this story of a real UK hosting company who did very recently accidentally delete the entire contents of several servers: bbc.com/news/technology-36072240
Apr 19, 2016 at 7:05 comment added galdin Something tells me that this isn't a hoax. He's just covering it up to save the reputation of his company.
Apr 18, 2016 at 16:34 answer added Ash timeline score: 4
Apr 18, 2016 at 14:32 comment added aroth At least use a better link to an article explaining the hoax. The current link points to an Italian website. Here's one in English. I don't think many people here are fluent in Italian?
Apr 18, 2016 at 14:09 comment added default Maybe the comments to journeymans answer should be cleaned up as well. the OP talks about recovering the data via a company which analyzed their discs, which I guess is not quite true. Will any moderator take a look at it or should I flag those which I feel are untrue?
Apr 18, 2016 at 3:51 comment added HopelessN00b @AaronHall Only the person who asked the question can accept or unaccept an answer.
Apr 17, 2016 at 14:55 answer added Florian Heigl timeline score: 28
Apr 17, 2016 at 12:52 answer added Basil timeline score: 5
Apr 17, 2016 at 12:44 comment added Sven Mod @AaronHall: I did merge the questions. This doesn't delete it outright though, but if you come here as an anonymous user, you get redirected to the merge target immediately and never see the hoax question.
Apr 17, 2016 at 12:23 comment added Aaron Hall Since we didn't delete, you should unaccept the delete answer.
Apr 17, 2016 at 7:02 comment added Sirex @Massimo we went into it thinking he was an idiot. We've came out of it thinking he's an idiot, but for a different reason. I don't think the joke is on us.
Apr 17, 2016 at 0:23 answer added Chris Martin timeline score: 9
Apr 16, 2016 at 19:01 comment added Sebb Is there an english write up article on how this was revealed?
Apr 16, 2016 at 18:20 vote accept Sven
Apr 16, 2016 at 18:19 comment added Massimo @dualed Not only against SE; looks like he posted the same fake request for help to other sites, too; this was one of the few place where someone actually catched something didn't smell right. And yes, in his interviews he shows a "you all fell for this and I'm SO smart" attitude which is IMHO quite childish.
Apr 16, 2016 at 12:51 history edited SvenMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 205 characters in body
Apr 16, 2016 at 9:56 comment added dualed The hoax author seems to mouth off against SE users in the newspaper article for not catching him at his hoax. Can anyone with more italian knowledge than my google translate skills verify this? I think this would make a dangerous precedent (@Massimo ?)
Apr 16, 2016 at 3:31 comment added joeytwiddle @MichaelHampton It's actually shocking to see how "respectable" newspapers have run this story as fact, without any research (like trying to find the name of the company he works for or any of the websites affected). But it is at least a good demonstration of which news sources cannot be trusted.
Apr 16, 2016 at 1:12 history tweeted twitter.com/ServerFault/status/721144174557425664
Apr 16, 2016 at 0:06 answer added user87122 timeline score: 4
Apr 15, 2016 at 23:01 vote accept SvenMod
Apr 15, 2016 at 23:01
Apr 15, 2016 at 22:31 comment added ott-- It even made it into a german newspaper (sueddeutsche.de/digital/…). They missed the / in the rm -rf / tho.
Apr 15, 2016 at 22:29 comment added Michael Hampton Mod Someone with a lot of time on their hands could contact all the news outlets which have run this story and advise them of the situation.
Apr 15, 2016 at 22:23 comment added Andrew B The mobile version of the news story appears to not display the full article. For me, it stops at the paragraph mentioning "140k persone", and I cannot find an option to display the full article. This is important because the content after that paragraph contains the admission of this Q&A existing as part of an effort to advertise his startup.
Apr 15, 2016 at 20:24 history edited Andrew B CC BY-SA 3.0
Question was undeleted, no longer applies.
Apr 15, 2016 at 19:57 comment added Chris Hayes @Massimo From what I know (which isn't much), a lot of the moderation tools around comments are designed for bulk deletion of comments. Oftentimes innocent comments are caught in the crossfire.
Apr 15, 2016 at 18:17 comment added Mark Henderson StaffMod @Massimo Oh I think that is highly unlikely. Lots of people are from the same country!
Apr 15, 2016 at 18:12 answer added user122772 timeline score: 3
Apr 15, 2016 at 18:04 comment added Massimo For the records, I don't know this guy and I don't have any relationship with him; and I sincerely hope whoever deleted my comments didn't do that on such an implication, possibly having seen how we both are from the same country.
Apr 15, 2016 at 18:03 comment added Massimo @MarkHenderson Fine, I can't see deleted comments at all; however, one of mine ("I won't even begin enumerating how many errors are simultaneously required in order to be able to completely erase all your servers and all your backups in a single strike. This is not bad luck: it's astonishingly bad design reinforced by complete carelessness.”) was upvoted a lot and even cited in the Independent article talking about the fact; I just wonder what logic exactly led to its deletion.
Apr 15, 2016 at 18:01 comment added user122772 Deleting as dup seems wrong. I don't have an opinion on what to do. Maybe just keep deleted but, how can something be a duplicated question if it was a FORGED situation? The problem didn't even existed at first place...
Apr 15, 2016 at 17:59 comment added Mark Henderson StaffMod @Massimo there are a lot of deleted comments on that post. Not just yours. As to why they were deleted, I'm unsure.
Apr 15, 2016 at 17:56 comment added Massimo Side question: why were my comments to this question deleted, and only mine (other comments are still there)? They were neither spam nor off-topic, as I was remarking the importance of proper backups and how being able at all to delete everything with a single command implied fundamental design flaws, rather than simple bad luck.
Apr 15, 2016 at 17:10 comment added Adam Davis For those, like me, left high and dry because we aren't yet at 10k, google does have a cache of most of the page content: webcache.googleusercontent.com/…
Apr 15, 2016 at 17:09 answer added Adam Davis timeline score: 41
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:54 answer added user9517 timeline score: 113
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:53 answer added user9517 timeline score: 116
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:51 comment added tombull89 @MartinSmith no - it was a duplicate. The original poster said in a recent article it was " a guerrilla marketing operation" so blatant spam/troll.
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:49 comment added Martin Smith Was the question a valid and useful question for server fault? If so why does it matter what the motivations of the asker were? Stack exchange is about building a Q and A for the public at large.
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:47 comment added Mark Henderson StaffMod Have we had any input from community@stack?
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:47 answer added Desperatuss0ccus timeline score: 13
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:35 history edited SvenMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 12 characters in body; edited title
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:34 answer added SvenMod timeline score: 55
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:33 answer added SvenMod timeline score: 3
Apr 15, 2016 at 13:32 history asked SvenMod CC BY-SA 3.0