12
votes
Stack Overflow Inc. changes policy regarding enforcement of AI-Generated posts
Oh dear, the Amazon sized river of shit that is the question feed will now be complimented by a gulf stream of crappy LLM answers. With so few people who actually curate the content here it's no going ...
9
votes
Accepted
Delete reasons in the Low Quality Posts review queue are alternating
It depends on the reputation level of the person whose answer you're reviewing. If they have too low a reputation to be able to post comments, the first option will be used. If they have enough ...
7
votes
Stack Overflow Inc. changes policy regarding enforcement of AI-Generated posts
Server Fault exists as a separate entity, among the thousands of SEO-stuffing sites competing for the same keywords, only as long as it is substantially exceeding their ability to curate content. Our ...
6
votes
Stack Overflow Inc. changes policy regarding enforcement of AI-Generated posts
Fantastic. So they don't give communities autonomy they've had previously on moderation, but rather stick a centralized policy.
This is not gonna strengthen the community. It may work out in very ...
3
votes
"bumped to the homepage by Community" generate mostly noise
Remember that voting in all of it's forms is community oversight. It's not about giving away a PhD, you don't need to solve the halting problem information just needs to be clear and correct/helpful.
...
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
low-quality × 11discussion × 6
support × 4
review × 4
flagging × 2
bug × 1
moderation × 1
migration × 1
vote-to-close × 1
doomed × 1
accepted-answer × 1
answering-questions × 1
up-votes × 1