I've chosen a question out of the list that was given and reset it. I couldn't find the question that was there previously.
I do, however, suspect that the unicorns ate it because somebody denied them their delicious daisies.
This is intended behavior. If an accepted answer is wildly wrong, the OP didn't know what they were doing perhaps, the downvotes are there to register the community's disapproval of the accepted answer and there will likely be another non-accepted answer that is much higher voted.
I've been in the same situation you are. What I ended up doing was editing ...
This rate limit applies to users with less than 125 reputation, and all posts made by anyone from the same IP address on any Stack Overflow or Stack Exchange site count toward the limit, even if they are made by accounts with more than 125 reputation. If someone is sharing your IP address and also posting, then you may see this unexpectedly.
There are ...
Usernames are indeed not unique on Stack Exchange.
Login tokens (OpenID) are uniquely associated with an account, and accounts are unique (identified by the account number), but you can have multiple accounts with the same display name.
The count in the top bar is site-wide, and includes items which you may have already reviewed or skipped, both of which no longer appear for you in the individual queue counts.
There's also caching, but that only lasts a minute or so.
To see the full counts, visit /review while logged out (e.g. in an incognito window).
StackExchange replaced the search engine a few months ago. Among the many changes are how string and substring searches are handled.
Quoted phrases are exact matches except for case-sensitivity, for example, [you can search for code] or symbols.
If not in a quoted phrase, words will now be stemmed (example)
As @Iain said earlier, quoting ...
Regular badges will not be revoked except in very special circumstances.
How do "badges" work?
Regular badges, however, once earned, are yours to keep. Even if the criteria by which you earned a badge have changed (the post was deleted, you got downvoted, etc.) you get to keep your badge. If you qualify for the same badge again (another post ...
The question is locked and retained for historical significance - from the close reason
This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. ...
Oh, oh indeed. I see the problem since the answer I was looking for as an example is your answer. I wondered why it was never deleted and it hadn't crossed my mind that you were stuck with it.
How can I list my open ports on Debian?
Yes, we've beat the dead horse in downvotes and it IS wrong that an answerer is stuck with that. As a general matter of ...
Ah nonsense, this was the new "Are you paying attention" crap, which now thinks I didn't pay attention as I clicked "no action needed". There was no action needed, Ian dealt with it already :)
This was the second such test today.
I'll leave this question for reference...
Looks like Yannis is right: when the question was closed, it triggered the migration rejection mechanism. The Server Fault version was then deleted since it was considered a rejected migration.
What you hit here is a bit of an edge case. In most situations, a migration is rejected before it picks up an answer and stays open for a whole month on the ...
Migration counts as the "latest activity" on a question, which drops the question in the active feed and shows it on the front page.
The age of the question is still whatever it actually is based on the timestamp set when you posted it. So your question does show up under "newest" in its appropriate chronological spot. (As I'm writing this, it's on page 5.)...
Before the close reason reform,
No, it's always been like that. (At least, I'm sure it happened to me before the new close vote reasons were implemented.)
It makes some sense... you have reviews left, so you could pick "Leave Open."
Just because the OP thinks an answer is good doesn't mean that it actually is, and this shouldn't deprive the rest of the community from indicating this by voting.
Deleting an accepted answer has been suggested on MSO and declined, although many people seem to disagree with Atwood's explanation. Personally I think that accepted answers should be deletable ...
This, to the best of my knowledge, is actually by-design. In this MSO thread, it says that as you could only be replying to the person that asked the question (in your example) then the @Username is stripped out automatically. If you can fully understand that answer in its entirety I would be more than impressed as it's not exactly clear.
I'm pretty sure this is intentional. The Excerpt shows up as a hover-box and the tag-style would be out of place in that box. The body of the tag-wiki can certainly use it though.
After some research, this has been brought up on M.SO before. Specifically:
Tag links in tag excerpts not shown properly
According to Shog9:
That was a last-minute bug fix. See, while meta let you enter a custom reason, it didn't actually do anything with that reason. This isn't ideal. So it was fixed before the network-wide rollout, and should disappear from Meta as well soon.
Folks who can vote to close directly still have the option, and it creates a comment along ...
Don't forget you can go to https://serverfault.com/reputation and see every reputation-affecting event for your account ever.
My guess is that a recalc happened and there was a discrepancy by 1 which has now been corrected.